Juliet laments that Romeo’s last name is what makes their love forbidden: “What’s in a name? That which we call a rose/By any other name would smell as sweet.”
But calling Socialism Democratic does not make it smell any sweeter.
Artificially attaching the word Democratic to Socialism—the first a political system, the second an economic system—no more legitimizes socialism than claiming Democratic Slavery makes slavery right and good. The real debate is between two economic systems, Socialism vs Free-Market Capitalism.
So too there is real confusion about the definitions of socialism and communism. Those who shun the light of truth embrace that lack of clarity to obscure their real intent—totalitarian power.
Here is the history: In March 1918, under Lenin, the Bolsheviks renamed themselves the Russian Communist Party. In 1922, the USSR (Union of Soviet Socialist Republics), came into being with Lenin as its founding leader.
Lenin died in 1924. Stalin, the General Secretary of the Communist Party from 1922 on, gradually eliminated rivals and consolidated sole power by the end of 1928 or so. He remained in power until his death in 1953.
We can call Soviet Russia the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics or call its supremely powerful and lethally authoritarian head the General Secretary of the Communist Party. But the argument differentiating socialism from communism is little more than a distinction without a difference. Communism is the river into which the stream of socialism flows.
History is clear. Under the leadership of Lenin and later Stalin, tens of millions of Soviet citizens died as a result of mass executions, the Gulag system, and policy-induced famines. That includes the Holodomor Famine. Holodomor is Ukrainian for “to kill by starvation.” Conservative scholarly estimates place the combined deaths between ten and twenty million or higher.
Despite the claims in the DSA (Democratic Socialist of America) platform, their promise to eliminate the U.S. Senate, the Supreme Court, and the presidency makes clear their intent: abolishing the separation of powers which was woven into the fabric of our constitution specifically to protect We the People from tyranny.
Socialist regimes seize and transfer control of the production and distribution of goods to collectives; historically that means government/state control. Socialism’s de facto entwining of politics and economic drivers consolidates power and wealth in the government, making it—and select, political elites—much bigger and its citizens much smaller.
Free-Market Capitalism’s private ownership and control of the production and distribution of goods democratically diversifies power and wealth across the private sector. It incentivizes life-changing innovation and builds a broader path to success.
Only in America: In the mid-70s a college dropout named Bill Gates started Microsoft in a small apartment in Albuquerque, New Mexico. Apple’s first computer was built in the garage of Steve Jobs’ parents. Amazon was born in Jeff Bezos’ garage in Bellevue, Washington. These three companies combine as of mid-August 2026 for a market capitalization of approximately $11 trillion (Apple ≈ $4.5T, Microsoft ≈ $3.7T, Amazon ≈ $2.8T). That is larger than the combined market capitalization of the stock markets of France, Germany, and Switzerland (roughly $8–9 trillion as of recent 2026 data). Collectively these 3 companies directly employ more than one million people in the U.S. alone. Estimates suggest the indirectly-employed and ripple effect numbers are between four and five million.
While promising the moral nightmare of freedom from responsibility, the historical end-reality for socialism is misery for the many, privilege for the few. Capitalism provides opportunity for the many, not just the few.
Ultimately, the shared shortcoming of all economic systems, including capitalism and socialism, is that they are but economic systems—merely mechanisms. Socio-politico-economic systems are nothing more than tools. Like hammers, they can be used to build hospitals and schools—or to nail a man to the cross.
While socialism appears to be an appealing hypothetical, the real-world failures of socialism spanning the last 200 years are a real-world horror. And despite the measurable wealth and opportunity spurred by Free-Market Capitalism, the abusive shortfalls of unfettered Capitalism are clear. Prioritizing profits to the detriment of people gave birth to Robber Barons who in turn spawned unions. These too are historical facts that must not be ignored.
The DSA’s promises of milk, honey, and golden eggs magically appearing from the good graces of government are political theater. It won’t end well.
Those who attack Free-Market Capitalism would devour the goose that lays the golden eggs. Be warned—not only will there be no more gold, there will be no more eggs—not for anyone but Socialist ruling class elites.
In the midst of our 250th anniversary, the time to choose is upon us. Pray. Vote. And pray some more.
–